| Possible ''Disappearances'' — Dmitry Zavadsky AI learned in May that several past and present members of the 
              elite Almaz police unit were being held in custody, charged in connection 
              with the kidnapping and possible murder of Russian Public Television 
              (ORT) cameraman Dmitry Zavadsky. Valery Ignatovich, Maksim Malik, 
              Aleksey Guz and Sergei Savushkin were expected to come to trial 
              at Minsk Regional Court in July. In contravention of various international 
              human rights standards the trial was reportedly going to be held 
              behind closed doors.Dmitry Zavadsky went missing on the morning of 7 July 2000, after 
              he drove to a Minsk airport to meet a journalist colleague, Pavel 
              Sheremet, who was arriving on an aeroplane from Moscow (see AI Index: 
              EUR 01/001/2001). Even though Dmitry Zavadsky's car was found parked 
              at the airport no trace has ever been found of the 27-year-old cameraman. 
              Dmitry Zavadsky's wife, Svetlana, informed an AI delegation in March 
              that she and their young son have received no word from him since 
              his whereabouts became unknown.
 The investigations into the apparent ''disappearance'' of Dmitry 
              Zavadsky as well as the other missing opposition leaders Yury Zakharenko, 
              Viktor Gonchar and his companion Anatoly Krasovsky have been cloaked 
              in controversy, eliciting domestic and international criticism relating 
              to their perceived transparency and impartiality (see AI Index: 
              49/002/2001). In March, the Parliamentary Troika, composed of members 
              of the European Parliament and the Parliamentary Assemblies of the 
              Council of Europe and the Organization for Security and Co-operation 
              (OSCE) in Europe, which had visited Belarus from 5 to 7 March, also 
              expressed ''... its continuing concern about the human rights situation'' 
              and particularly ''... at the lack of progress in investigating 
              the disappearances of political opponents, Mr Zakharenko, Mr Gonchar, 
              Mr Krasovsky as well as the journalist Mr Zavadsky'' (11).
 Toward the end of the period under review there were reports that 
              two officials of the Prosecutor General's Office, Dmitry Petrushkevich 
              and Oleg Sluchek, assigned to investigate the possible "disappearances", 
              fled to the USA in June, where they obtained asylum. They alleged 
              that officials in President Lukashenka's immediate circle of appointees 
              had employed the elite Almaz police group to eliminate a number 
              of Belarus' opposition. The missing men are reportedly buried in 
              a graveyard to the north of the capital, Minsk.
 Prisoner of conscience — Professor Yury Bandazhevsky On 18 June 43-year-old Professor Yury Bandazhevsky was sentenced 
              by the Military Collegium of the Belarusian Supreme Court in Gomel 
              to eight years' imprisonment in a strict penal colony with confiscation 
              of property for allegedly taking bribes from students seeking admission 
              to the Gomel Medical Institute, of which he is the former rector 
              (see AI Index: EUR 49/008/2001). AI believes that his conviction 
              is related to his outspoken criticism of the Belarusian authorities' 
              reaction to the Chernobyl nuclear reactor catastrophe of 1986, and 
              considers him to be a prisoner of conscience.International and domestic trial observers considered not only that 
              the basis of Yury Bandazhevsky's conviction appeared extremely weak, 
              but also that his right to a fair trial had been repeatedly violated. 
              The Advisory and Monitoring Group of the OSCE in Belarus, which 
              had observed the entire duration of the trial, noted eight different 
              infringements of the Belarusian Criminal Code during the pre-trial 
              investigation and trial. These included the violation of Yury Bandazhevsky's 
              right to defence, as he was denied access to counsel during the 
              entirety of his six months in pre-trial detention. At the time of 
              writing Yury Bandazhevsky was imprisoned at the UZ 15/1 prison in 
              Minsk, where he was being held in a dormitory-type prison cell with 
              around 150 other prisoners, sleeping in three-tiered bunk beds.
 The release of prisoner of conscience. Vladimir Koudinov On 5 February prisoner of conscience Vladimir Koudinov was released 
              in an amnesty after serving four years' in prison. He was originally 
              sentenced to seven years' imprisonment in August 1997 on the charge 
              of allegedly bribing a police officer (see AI Index: EUR 49/14/00). 
              As a deputy of the dissolved Belarusian parliament, the 13th Supreme 
              Soviet, Vladimir Koudinov had taken an active role in attempting 
              to impeach President Alyaksandr Lukashenka for dissolving parliament 
              in November 1996. AI believed that he — like other deputies of the 
              13th Supreme Soviet — had been imprisoned for his opposition activities. 
              In early March he informed an AI delegation visiting Minsk about 
              the egregious conditions of his detention and how he felt that he 
              had been adversely treated by the prison authorities on account 
              of his political status. Human rights defenders For 12 days at the end of February and the beginning of March an 
              AI delegation visited the Belarusian cities of Brest, Gomel, Minsk, 
              Mogilov and Vitebsk, conducting interviews with a range of human 
              rights defenders. The report of the visit, In the Spotlight of the 
              State: Human Rights Defenders in Belarus (AI Index: EUR 49/005/2001) 
              highlights the considerable obstacles faced by individuals engaged 
              in human rights defence and promotion in Belarus. Prisoner of conscience — human rights defender Valery 
              Schukin On 12 June 60-year-old Valery Schukin the veteran human rights 
              defender, independent journalist and member of the dissolved Belarusian 
              parliament began a three-month prison sentence. He was convicted 
              by Minsk City Court on 17 April for his role in organizing the October 
              1999 pro-democracy Freedom March, and for alleged hooliganism relating 
              to an incident which occurred on 16 January, when police officers 
              refused him entry to a press conference given by the Minister of 
              the Interior, Vladimir Naumov, in Minsk. A struggle reportedly ensued 
              between the human rights activists and guards policing access to 
              the conference, who violently forced him to the ground. In early 
              July Valery Schukin was transferred to Zhodino prison where prison 
              officials allegedly forcibly shaved off his long beard using a blunt 
              razor. New legal restrictions of the rights to freedom of 
              association and assembly AI expressed concern about the introduction of two presidential 
              decrees, apparently designed to hamper the peaceful protest activities 
              of Belarus' opposition in the run-up to the presidential election, 
              planned for 9 September. On 14 March President Alyaksandr Lukashenka 
              issued the decree ''Several Measures on Improving Distribution and 
              Use of Foreign Humanitarian Aid'', which effectively prohibited 
              the use of foreign funding for pro-democracy purposes. The decree 
              prevents foreign monetary and non-monetary aid given to non-government 
              organizations (NGOs) and political parties from being used for a 
              broad range of activities, including the organization and monitoring 
              of elections and various protest actions. NGOs will run the risk 
              of incurring fines and closure if they violate the broadly-sweeping 
              legislation.On 11 May Presidential decree, ''On Certain Measures to Improve 
              Procedures of Holding Meetings, Rallies, Street Processions, Demonstrations 
              and other Mass Actions and Pickets'', also came into effect, which 
              imposes new restrictions on the right of freedom of assembly. Under 
              the decree the body organizing a sanctioned event will be held entirely 
              responsible for the action and may be fined or de-registered if 
              public order is deemed to have been violated.
  Arbitrary detention of Zubr human rights activists During the period of review a significant number of activists of 
              the newly emerged youth pro-democracy and human rights organization, 
              Zubr, served periods of imprisonment after being arrested on account 
              of their peaceful protest activities. On 5 March three Zubr activists 
              were detained outside the Presidential Administration Building in 
              central Minsk for protesting against the spate of possible ''disappearances'' 
              in Belarus. One of the three youths, Anton Telezhnikov, was sentenced 
              to 15 days' imprisonment. AI considered him to be a prisoner of 
              conscience.In the early hours of 5 April four Zubr activists, Aleksey Shidlovsky, 
              Timofey Dranchuk, Dmitry Drapochko and Ales Apranisch, were detained 
              in Minsk for allegedly spray-painting on the wall of a factory: 
              ''Where is Gonchar? Where is Zavadsky? Where is Zakharenko?''. They 
              were released late the following day and were allegedly not given 
              prompt access to a lawyer. The youths are currently facing criminal 
              charges and were expected to be tried later in 2001. In February 
              1998 Aleksey Shidlovsky was sentenced to 18-months' imprisonment 
              for a similar offence and was adopted by AI as a prisoner of conscience.
 On the same day, another Zubr youth activist, Nikita Sasim, was 
              reportedly detained in the town of Baranovichi, south-west of Minsk, 
              by two police officers for writing the word 'Zubr' on walls. He 
              was held overnight. According to the human rights organization Spring-96, 
              the police officers beat the handcuffed youth and poured paint over 
              his head. During his interrogation on 6 April the police officers 
              allegedly forced the youth to the floor of the prison cell and threatened 
              to torture him with electric shock treatment. He was released later 
              that day when his mother collected him from the Moskovsky District 
              Department of Internal Affairs, where he was being held.
 On 21 April 33 young people were detained during a peaceful anti-presidential 
              event in Gorky Park in Minsk. A number of the detainees alleged 
              that police officers used excessive force to detain them or otherwise 
              ill-treated them. Fourteen of the 33 youths remained in detention 
              at Okrestina detention centre in Minsk until 25 April when they 
              were brought before a court, which sentenced them to three days' 
              imprisonment. Having remained in Okrestina detention centre since 
              21 April they were allowed to go free. Participants Sergei Pyanukh 
              and Valery Zherbin were later sentenced to 10 days' imprisonment 
              in May. AI considered them to be prisoners of conscience.
 In the period under review AI learned of significant numbers of 
              other pro-democracy and human rights activists who were arbitrarily 
              deprived of their liberty. On the peaceful Day of Freedom demonstration 
              on 25 March around 15 demonstrators were detained in Minsk for organizing 
              or participating in an unsanctioned demonstration. While most of 
              the detainees escaped imprisonment with a fine, several others including 
              20-year-old Dmitry Chubarenka, Spring-96's Ales Byalytski and Vincuk 
              Via…orka were subsequently sentenced to between 10 and 15 day terms 
              of imprisonment. AI considered them to be prisoners of conscience.
 In the morning of 18 May, police officers reportedly detained approximately 
              30 protestors outside the Palace of the Republic building in Minsk. 
              The protestors - who belonged to the Belarusian Conservative Christian 
              Party - reportedly carried posters of the men who have apparently 
              ''disappeared''. Other protestors reportedly held placards and distributed 
              leaflets contesting the proposed union of Belarus with Russia. Plain-clothes 
              police officers are alleged to have used force to disperse the peaceful 
              protestors and ill-treated a number of them, resulting in one man, 
              Vladimir Yukho, suffering a broken arm and another man reportedly 
              experienced severe heart problems. Throughout the day and evening 
              plain-clothes police officers reportedly detained other peaceful 
              protestors from the Youth Front of the Belarusian Popular Front 
              and the United Civic Party. Both groups of protestors lined Minsk's 
              main thoroughfare, Prospect Frantsysk Skaryna, at different times 
              of the day holding placards of the missing opposition figures. The 
              plainclothes police officers reportedly detained around a dozen 
              protestors, seven of them youths, one of whom was allegedly seriously 
              beaten.
 Possible harassment of opposition family members The sons of two of President Alyaksandr Lukashenka's political 
              opponents were arrested in the period under review. AI is concerned 
              that the two men may have been deliberately targeted by the Belarusian 
              authorities in order to put pressure on their families. Former prisoner 
              of conscience Mikhail Chigir's son, Alyaksandr Chigir, was arrested 
              on 10 February, accused of dealing in stolen motor vehicle parts. 
              Members of Belarus' opposition have stated that the arrest was to 
              put pressure on Mikhail Chigir, who had planned to stand as a candidate 
              in the 2001 presidential elections. Since his arrest he has been 
              held in pre-trial detention, reportedly sharing his cell with 26-year-old 
              Sergei Vinnikov, son of the former Chairperson of the Belarusian 
              National Bank, Tamara Vinnikova, who escaped to Britain from under 
              KGB house arrest in April 1999. Her son was reportedly charged with 
              the possession of drugs on 21 March and remains in pre-trial detention 
              in Minsk. Freedom of the media AI continued to receive reports about the harassment and intimidation 
              of Belarus' community of independent journalists. The offices of 
              several independent newspapers were raided by the tax officials, 
              including Borisovskie Novosti on 16 March and Nasha Svaboda on 19 
              June. The home of the Den and Belarusky Chas journalist, Sergei 
              Anisko, were also raided by police on 20 June. Individual newspaper 
              vendors selling the independent press reportedly suffered newspaper 
              confiscations. In the first six months of 2001 particular concern 
              was also expressed about the draft law, Law on Information Security, 
              which — if adopted in its draft format — would confer on the Belarusian 
              authorities a range of powers by which to censor the media and stifle 
              media freedom.  
 |