| Concluding consideration of Third Committee reports,
General Assembly adopts convention on enforced disappearances.
December 20, 2006. The General Assembly adopted an International
Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
and deferred action on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights
of Indigenous Peoples as it adopted the remaining seven resolutions
and three decisions recommended by its Third Committee (Social,
Humanitarian and Cultural).
The Convention, which had been co-sponsored by more than 100 Member
States and adopted by the newly-established Human Rights Council
in June, would recognize the right of persons not to be subjected
to enforced disappearance, regardless of circumstances, and the
right of victims to justice and reparation. It would commit States
party to it to criminalize enforced disappearance, to bring those
responsible to justice and to take preventive measures.
The representative of Honduras called the day an historic and hopeful
one, on which the Assembly had taken a meaningful step forward in
international law. States and Governments were shouldering an important
commitment with a full sense of responsibility, aiming to leave
behind the days of horror that had been the scourge of so many countries.
The adoption of the Convention was the dawn of a new age of actual
implementation of human rights and the end of impunity.
The representative of France, which sponsored the draft, said that
the new instrument was emblematic of United Nations action to benefit
individuals. While the practice of enforced disappearances unfortunately
remained a tangible reality, the Convention’s innovative follow-up
mechanism of a Committee on Enforced Disappearances would assume
a preventive function by making urgent appeals and conducting field
visits, when necessary, even alerting the Secretary-General in the
event of massive and systematic violations.
The representative of Argentina noted that today’s adoption of
the Convention on Enforced Disappearances represented a marked departure
from the 1970s, when the military dictatorship in his country had
carried out the abhorrent practice and the former United Nations
Human Rights Commission had offered no condemnation. He hoped that
the adoption would not mark the end of the road, but the beginning
of a new phase in the promotion and protection of human rights.
While the resolution was adopted by consensus, its consideration
was not without controversy. As they had yesterday, the representatives
of Japan and the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea again traded
accusations over allegations of abductions.
The representative of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
said that, despite Japan’s denials, that country had abducted citizens
from his nation. As proof, he read out a letter written in 1992
by a young man who had reportedly been kidnapped and was being held
inside Japan.
The representative of Japan insisted that his Government had never
been involved in any such abductions. Meanwhile, there were at least
17 Japanese citizens that had been abducted, and his Government
would like a sincere and honest response as to their whereabouts.
In other business, the Assembly adopted a resolution on the United
Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, by which
it decided to defer consideration of and action on that document
until sometime before the end of the current session. The deferment
had been sought by delegations who had expressed concerns about
the Declaration’s potential effects on national sovereignty and
land rights, though several other Member States, mainly from Latin
America, had noted during the Committee’s meetings that, after 24
years of drafting and revisions to address the concerns of many
delegations, it was time to make the Declaration a reality.
That resolution was adopted by a recorded vote of 85 in favour
to none against, with 89 abstentions.
|