Concluding consideration of Third Committee
reports, General Assembly adopts convention on enforced
disappearances.
December 20, 2006. The General Assembly adopted an International
Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced
Disappearance and deferred action on the United Nations
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples as it adopted
the remaining seven resolutions and three decisions recommended
by its Third Committee (Social, Humanitarian and Cultural).
The Convention, which had been co-sponsored by more than
100 Member States and adopted by the newly-established Human
Rights Council in June, would recognize the right of persons
not to be subjected to enforced disappearance, regardless
of circumstances, and the right of victims to justice and
reparation. It would commit States party to it to criminalize
enforced disappearance, to bring those responsible to justice
and to take preventive measures.
The representative of Honduras called the day an historic
and hopeful one, on which the Assembly had taken a meaningful
step forward in international law. States and Governments
were shouldering an important commitment with a full sense
of responsibility, aiming to leave behind the days of horror
that had been the scourge of so many countries. The adoption
of the Convention was the dawn of a new age of actual implementation
of human rights and the end of impunity.
The representative of France, which sponsored the draft,
said that the new instrument was emblematic of United Nations
action to benefit individuals. While the practice of enforced
disappearances unfortunately remained a tangible reality,
the Convention’s innovative follow-up mechanism of a Committee
on Enforced Disappearances would assume a preventive function
by making urgent appeals and conducting field visits, when
necessary, even alerting the Secretary-General in the event
of massive and systematic violations.
The representative of Argentina noted that today’s adoption
of the Convention on Enforced Disappearances represented
a marked departure from the 1970s, when the military dictatorship
in his country had carried out the abhorrent practice and
the former United Nations Human Rights Commission had offered
no condemnation. He hoped that the adoption would not mark
the end of the road, but the beginning of a new phase in
the promotion and protection of human rights.
While the resolution was adopted by consensus, its consideration
was not without controversy. As they had yesterday, the
representatives of Japan and the Democratic People’s Republic
of Korea again traded accusations over allegations of abductions.
The representative of the Democratic People’s Republic
of Korea said that, despite Japan’s denials, that country
had abducted citizens from his nation. As proof, he read
out a letter written in 1992 by a young man who had reportedly
been kidnapped and was being held inside Japan.
The representative of Japan insisted that his Government
had never been involved in any such abductions. Meanwhile,
there were at least 17 Japanese citizens that had been abducted,
and his Government would like a sincere and honest response
as to their whereabouts.
In other business, the Assembly adopted a resolution on
the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous
Peoples, by which it decided to defer consideration of and
action on that document until sometime before the end of
the current session. The deferment had been sought by delegations
who had expressed concerns about the Declaration’s potential
effects on national sovereignty and land rights, though
several other Member States, mainly from Latin America,
had noted during the Committee’s meetings that, after 24
years of drafting and revisions to address the concerns
of many delegations, it was time to make the Declaration
a reality.
That resolution was adopted by a recorded vote of 85 in
favour to none against, with 89 abstentions.
|